Your planning cycle, run with you.

For organizations where requests arrive from several directions and draw on the same people. We combine the lists, agree the criteria, and work out with you what fits.

01

Who it is for

Leaders responsible for more work than their teams can deliver: a product leader with several roadmaps and one engineering group, an operating executive whose committees set priorities separately, a founder whose plan changes often.

02

Combining the lists

Competing lists become one set of options that can be compared fairly, with categories made explicit.

03

Agreeing the criteria

What the organization values is written down as weighted criteria, agreed before individual items are discussed.

04

Scoring with evidence

Options are scored by the people closest to them, with estimates kept deliberately rough where precision is not available.

05

Testing capacity

A clear view of what fits within capacity, what does not, and by how much the current plan is over-committed.

06

The record

An agreed plan with its reasoning attached, including what was deferred or stopped and why.

07

Typical shape

An initial working session, then a facilitated cycle over four to six weeks. Scope and cost are agreed in a first conversation.

One team, one quarter
  1. 01 Self-serve onboarding
  2. 02 SOC 2 Type II evidence
  3. 03 Usage-based pricing Capacity line
  4. 04 Partner onboarding
  5. 05 iOS beta
  6. 06 Access-log retention
Everything below the line is still on the record — deferred on purpose, with a reason, not quietly dropped.

Peak Priorities

Talk with us about your situation.